Protecting What You've

Worked Hard to Earn.

News and Research

Bulletproof Veil: How it works.
 
Member Newsletters
Free Newsletter Example
 
Case Studies
University of Hard Knocks
 
The White Paper
The Myth of Corporate Veil Protection
 
Additional Evaluations
Protect Against Veil Piercing
 
 
 

Your name
 

Your email address
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 2008  
 

Dear Current and Future Bulletproof Veil Subscribers,

The use of nontraditional or alternative investments is at an all-time high with owners of Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). These investments are usually done through “self-directed” IRAs, where the account owner makes investment decisions and investments on behalf of the retirement plan. Popular nontraditional investments include things such as real estate, mortgages and closely held business entities.

Aggressive promoters are pushing strategies involving self-directed IRAs. Some tell you to use a self-directed IRA together with a privately held business entity to make investments. Headlines like “Buy Real Estate, Tax Liens, Financial Paper, Discounted Notes, Invest in a Business, and Make Private Loans without Custodial Interference!” are common.

"Nothing in the United States Internal Revenue Code prevents you from using IRA funds to invest in things like privately held corporations, LLCs, or limited partnerships, and many people choose to do so. Still, acquiring or selling investments like these within an IRA can pose some significant risks. You should understand the risks and rules before you invest.

Bulletproof Veil can help you stay compliant if you have a private business entity linked to your IRA. Make sure you avoid painful and costly traps. Enroll now or contact your Bulletproof Veil representative for more information.

 

Take Care Before You Invest IRA Money in a Private Business

Investment Flexibility with IRAs

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), which created the IRA in 1974, places surprisingly few re- strictions on how retirement money can be invested. Ex- cept for life insurance or collectibles - such as artwork or coins - IRA funds can be placed in just about anything.

To take advantage of this flexibility, investors usually es- tablish self-directed IRAs. In a self-directed IRA, the IRA owner takes over investment decision making from the IRA trustee, who simply operates as a custodian with no discre- tion to manage the account’s assets. For example, if you have an IRA account with a firm like Charles Schwab, you can make the IRA self-directed and tell the Schwab people how to invest your IRA funds.

Tens of thousands of investors have switched their retire- ment savings to self-directed accounts since the stock mar- ket correction of 2000 and 2001. By some estimates, 3% of the approximately $3.5 trillion held in IRAs is now in alternative investments.

As a result, some self-directed IRA owners have enjoyed greater satisfaction and improved returns. Others, however, have made some painful mistakes that ended up costing a lot of money.

Three Major Self-Directed IRA Risks

Using a self-directed IRA to acquire or sell nontraditional investments poses three major risks. This is particularly true if the IRA invests in a privately held business entity such as a corporation or LLC.

1. Increased potential for a prohibited transaction

There are certain transactions in which you cannot partici- pate when using IRA funds. These are called “prohibited transactions”. Prohibited transactions are defined in section 4975(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code. You can also find them in IRS Publication 590.

Prohibited transactions were established to make sure that all an IRA’s actions are for the exclusive benefit of the retire- ment plan. Generally speaking, a prohibited transaction is a form of “self-dealing”, where you sit on both sides of the table in a financial transaction. Many prohibited transac- tions involve the participation of a “disqualified person”, any person restricted by IRA rules from being involved in a given IRA transaction.

Engaging in a prohibited transaction results in a loss of the IRA’s tax-exempt status and a deemed distribution of the account’s assets. In other words, if you’re guilty of a pro- hibited transaction, your IRA will lose its tax status and you will immediately incur a tax liability on any deferred in- come over the life of the IRA. This could be a financially catastrophic event.

2. Difficulty in complying with tax reporting and administrative duties

All IRAs have mandatory tax reporting and administrative responsibilities. One responsibility that can trip you up if you have nontraditional investments is valuation reporting.

Your IRA must report an accurate fair market value (FMV) of the IRA’s assets to the Internal Revenue Service. If your IRA invests in the stock of a publicly held company, for example, determining a fair market value is a simple matter of taking the current stock price times the number of shares held by the IRA.

However, if your IRA holds nontraditional investments that aren’t traded on public markets, such as part ownership of a limited liability company, establishing a fair market value that will withstand IRS scrutiny becomes much more diffi- cult. By their very nature, alternative investments frequently do not have a readily available market value. Still, the IRA must obtain an estimated FMV from a reliable source. This could add significant expense and difficulty to the manage- ment of your IRA.

3. Liability exposure

Traditional IRA investments are usually fairly low in risk. For example, if your IRA is a shareholder in a public compa- ny, the law protects your IRA and other shareholders from liability for the company’s actions. With bonds and other common IRA investments, liability risks to the investment holder are likewise minimal.

With nontraditional investments, liability risk can increase significantly. If your IRA is one of a few investors in a private investment, the risk of disputes and litigation can be significantly greater.

While state laws exist to protect assets held within IRAs, remember that IRA liability protection is much weaker than that for ERISA qualified plans such as 401k plans. Liability threats that would be thwarted by an ERISA plan could prove troublesome to your IRA assets.

Summary & Conclusion

There is a common theme in owning privately held businesses and self-directed IRAs: If you know and understand the rules, you can enjoy the benefits while avoiding the pitfalls.

Bulletproof Veil can help keep you on the straight and narrow.. Enroll today and contact your Bulletproof Veil Representative for more information.

 

Material discussed is meant for illustration and/or informational purposes only and it is not to be construed as tax or legal advice. Although the information has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, note that individual situations can vary.

  • September 2008 - You Can Be Liable for the Debts of Someone Else's Business
  • August 2008 - Litigation on the Rise: How to Solve Disputes Outside the Courtroom
  • July 2008 - The Oil Industry, CERCLA, and Corporate Veil Piercing
  • June 2008 - Take Care Before You Invest IRA Money in a Private Buisness
  • May 2008 - Wesley Snipes and the IRS "Dirty Dozen"
  • April 2008 - Bear Stearns, Subprime Mortgage Loans, and Veil Piercing
  • March 2008 - The Supreme Court Just Made Your Retirement Plan MoreRisky
 

Don’t Neglect the Tax Management Aspect of Asset Protection

Whether asset protection should address saving taxes is an ongoing argument between asset protection providers. Some promoters make outlandish promises of huge tax savings if you purchase their services. Others argue that asset protection never provides tax savings and you should beware of anyone who says otherwise.

Part of the problem lies in how people define “asset protection”. Some define it narrowly as protection against civil court judgments. At Bulletproof Veil, we define asset protection as “employing legally compliant concepts and strategies to ensure a person’s wealth is not unjustly taken from him or her.” Let’s apply this definition to taxes. Between income, gift, and estate taxes, you probably stand to lose much more of your wealth from overpaying taxes than from being on the losing end of a lawsuit. You’d be foolish to ignore your greatest financial threat when building your asset protection plan. But most taxpayers fail to take advantage of the many legal methods to lower one’s taxes. Some are afraid of getting caught up in illegal tax schemes. Others are simply ignorant of the money-saving possibilities.

Understanding the role of tax management in asset protection is critical to your financial well-being. The key is to identify, implement and maintain sound tax strategies in a legally compliant fashion. If you have a strategy solidly grounded in tax law, capable of withstanding legal or audit scrutiny, which will save you money, it should be part of your asset protection plan.

At Bulletproof Veil we help you with the all-important maintenance of your asset protection plan. This includes monitoring your tax strategies to see if they comply with changes in federal and state law. When you look at saving taxes, consider the following:

1. Understand the Five Pillars of Tax Planning – At a high level, opportunities to save on taxes can be grouped into five categories: 1) Changing how you take compensation; 2) Maximizing deductions to taxable income; 3) Lowering the tax rate applied to your money; 4) Collecting tax credits and deferrals; and 5) Using fringe benefits. Bulletproof Veil can help you apply these pillars to your specific circumstances.

2. Don’t Assume your Tax Return Preparer is the Best Source of Tax Strategies – Bulletproof Veil works with CPAs around the country. It’s amazing how many freely admit that they’d rather have their clients overpay taxes than actively minimize them. For example, when informed by Bulletproof Veil of a $100,000 tax savings opportunity for a client if the CPA filed before a December 31 deadline, the CPA replied, “Oh, let’s not bother. He [the client] can always make another $100,000 next year.” You need to work with competent tax strategists who can help you develop and implement a comprehensive plan.

3. Remember that Tax Laws Can Change Frequently – Tax laws and regulations are constantly changing. This process constantly opens up new tax savings opportunities, but it also can remove or change past rules that may impact your asset protection plan. You’ve got to stay current in order to be compliant.

The monitoring and tracking of Bulletproof Veil is essential to help you maintain your asset protection plan. Contact your Bulletproof Veil representative for more information.

 

Georgia Court rules Cap on Noneconomic Malpractice Damages is Unconstitutional

Superior Court Judge Marvin S. Arrington Sr. found the state’s $350,000 limit on noneconomic damages for medical malpractice unconstitutional, saying it violated patients’ equal protection rights and access to a jury trial. “There is no doubt that the caps go to the core of a party’s right to have a jury determine his or her claims,” Arrington wrote. “One category of professional defendants has been singled out for special protection, with the result that their victims have been singled out for special disadvantages and limitations.” A February AMA report showed that states with noneconomic damage limits benefit from an increased supply of high-risk specialists.

Estate Tax Planning Will be Very Difficult from 2008 - 2011

Both the federal estate tax rate and the tax exemption amount will continue to change over the next several years. In 2008, the exemption is $2 million, while it jumps to $3.5 million in 2009. In 2010, the estate tax disappears entirely, but unless Congress acts it returns in 2011 with a 55% top tax rate and a $1 million exemption amount. If your total estate will be subject to estate tax, you should consult with qualified professionals each year between now and 2011 to make sure your estate documents are correctly structured. Otherwise, your death or your spouse’s death could be a very expensive prospect for your heirs and beneficiaries.

Corporation-Suing Attorney Sentenced to 30 Months in Prison

Melvyn Weiss, the plaintiffs’ lawyer who pioneered a controversial and lucrative area of law by suing corporations on behalf of shareholders, was sentenced to 30 months in prison. Weiss pled guilty in a federal racketeering conspiracy, admitting that he entered into “secret payment arrangements” with individuals who agreed to serve as lead plaintiffs in class action lawsuits. Weiss co-founded the law firm known now has Milberg LLP in 1965, helping build it for a time into a powerhouse that filed more class actions -- and won more settlements -- than any other firm.

IRS is Increasing Audits of Small Companies while Easing Up on Large Firms

According to a new study from the Transactional Records Clearinghouse at Syracuse University, small companies were audited by the IRS 41% more often in 2007 than in 2005, and companies with $10 million to $50 million in assets were 29% more likely to be investigated. Meanwhile, companies with more than $250 million in assets were almost 40% less likely to be audited than in previous years. “Large corporations, with their armies of tax attorneys and accountants, are able to drag out an audit for years at a time,” explains Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who sits on the House Committee on Ways and Means, which oversees the IRS. “Consequently, auditors tend to focus on smaller businesses that lack such resources.”