Dear Current and Future Bulletproof Veil Subscribers,
The use of nontraditional or alternative investments is at an all-time high with owners of Individual Retirement
Arrangements (IRAs). These investments are usually done through “self-directed” IRAs, where the account
owner makes investment decisions and investments on behalf of the retirement plan. Popular nontraditional
investments include things such as real estate, mortgages and closely held business entities.
Aggressive promoters are pushing strategies involving self-directed IRAs. Some tell you to use a self-directed IRA
together with a privately held business entity to make investments. Headlines like “Buy Real Estate, Tax Liens,
Financial Paper, Discounted Notes, Invest in a Business, and Make Private Loans without Custodial Interference!” are common.
"Nothing in the United States Internal Revenue Code prevents you from using IRA funds to invest in things like
privately held corporations, LLCs, or limited partnerships, and many people choose to do so. Still, acquiring or
selling investments like these within an IRA can pose some significant risks. You should understand the risks and
rules before you invest.
Bulletproof Veil can help you stay compliant if you have a private business entity linked to your IRA. Make sure
you avoid painful and costly traps. Enroll now or contact your Bulletproof Veil representative for more information.
Take Care Before You Invest IRA Money in a Private Business
Investment Flexibility with IRAs
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),
which created the IRA in 1974, places surprisingly few re-
strictions on how retirement money can be invested. Ex-
cept for life insurance or collectibles - such as artwork or
coins - IRA funds can be placed in just about anything.
To take advantage of this flexibility, investors usually es-
tablish self-directed IRAs. In a self-directed IRA, the IRA
owner takes over investment decision making from the IRA
trustee, who simply operates as a custodian with no discre-
tion to manage the account’s assets. For example, if you
have an IRA account with a firm like Charles Schwab, you
can make the IRA self-directed and tell the Schwab people
how to invest your IRA funds.
Tens of thousands of investors have switched their retire-
ment savings to self-directed accounts since the stock mar-
ket correction of 2000 and 2001. By some estimates, 3%
of the approximately $3.5 trillion held in IRAs is now in
alternative investments.
As a result, some self-directed IRA owners have enjoyed
greater satisfaction and improved returns. Others, however,
have made some painful mistakes that ended up costing a
lot of money.
Three Major Self-Directed IRA Risks
Using a self-directed IRA to acquire or sell nontraditional
investments poses three major risks. This is particularly true
if the IRA invests in a privately held business entity such as
a corporation or LLC.
1. Increased potential for a prohibited transaction
There are certain transactions in which you cannot partici-
pate when using IRA funds. These are called “prohibited
transactions”. Prohibited transactions are defined in section
4975(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code. You can also find
them in IRS Publication 590.
Prohibited transactions were established to make sure that
all an IRA’s actions are for the exclusive benefit of the retire-
ment plan. Generally speaking, a prohibited transaction is
a form of “self-dealing”, where you sit on both sides of the
table in a financial transaction. Many prohibited transac-
tions involve the participation of a “disqualified person”,
any person restricted by IRA rules from being involved in a
given IRA transaction.
Engaging in a prohibited transaction results in a loss of the
IRA’s tax-exempt status and a deemed distribution of the
account’s assets. In other words, if you’re guilty of a pro-
hibited transaction, your IRA will lose its tax status and you
will immediately incur a tax liability on any deferred in-
come over the life of the IRA. This could be a financially
catastrophic event.
2. Difficulty in complying with tax reporting and
administrative duties
All IRAs have mandatory tax reporting and administrative
responsibilities. One responsibility that can trip you up if
you have nontraditional investments is valuation reporting.
Your IRA must report an accurate fair market value (FMV)
of the IRA’s assets to the Internal Revenue Service. If your
IRA invests in the stock of a publicly held company, for
example, determining a fair market value is a simple matter
of taking the current stock price times the number of shares
held by the IRA.
However, if your IRA holds nontraditional investments that
aren’t traded on public markets, such as part ownership of
a limited liability company, establishing a fair market value
that will withstand IRS scrutiny becomes much more diffi-
cult. By their very nature, alternative investments frequently
do not have a readily available market value. Still, the IRA
must obtain an estimated FMV from a reliable source. This
could add significant expense and difficulty to the manage-
ment of your IRA.
3. Liability exposure
Traditional IRA investments are usually fairly low in risk.
For example, if your IRA is a shareholder in a public compa-
ny, the law protects your IRA and other shareholders from
liability for the company’s actions. With bonds and other
common IRA investments, liability risks to the investment
holder are likewise minimal.
With nontraditional investments, liability risk can increase
significantly. If your IRA is one of a few investors in a private investment, the risk of disputes and litigation can be
significantly greater.
While state laws exist to protect assets held within IRAs,
remember that IRA liability protection is much weaker than
that for ERISA qualified plans such as 401k plans. Liability
threats that would be thwarted by an ERISA plan could
prove troublesome to your IRA assets.
Summary & Conclusion
There is a common theme in owning privately held businesses and self-directed IRAs: If you know and understand
the rules, you can enjoy the benefits while avoiding the pitfalls.
Bulletproof Veil can help keep you on the straight and narrow.. Enroll today and contact your Bulletproof Veil Representative for more information.
Material discussed is meant for illustration and/or informational purposes only and it is not to be construed as tax or legal advice. Although the information has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, note that individual situations can vary.
|
|
|
- September 2008 - You Can Be Liable for the Debts of Someone Else's Business
- August 2008 - Litigation on the Rise: How to Solve Disputes Outside the Courtroom
- July 2008 - The Oil Industry, CERCLA, and Corporate Veil Piercing
- June 2008 - Take Care Before You Invest IRA Money in a Private Buisness
- May 2008 - Wesley Snipes and the IRS "Dirty Dozen"
- April 2008 - Bear Stearns, Subprime Mortgage Loans, and Veil Piercing
- March 2008 - The Supreme Court Just Made Your Retirement Plan MoreRisky
|
| |
|
|
Don’t Neglect the Tax Management Aspect of Asset Protection
Whether asset protection should address saving taxes is an ongoing argument between asset protection providers.
Some promoters make outlandish promises of huge tax savings if you purchase their services. Others argue that
asset protection never provides tax savings and you should beware of anyone who says otherwise.
Part of the problem lies in how people define “asset protection”. Some define it narrowly as protection against
civil court judgments. At Bulletproof Veil, we define asset protection as “employing legally compliant concepts
and strategies to ensure a person’s wealth is not unjustly taken from him or her.” Let’s apply this definition to
taxes. Between income, gift, and estate taxes, you probably stand to lose much more of your wealth from overpaying taxes than from being on the losing end of a lawsuit. You’d be foolish to ignore your greatest financial threat
when building your asset protection plan. But most taxpayers fail to take advantage of the many legal methods to
lower one’s taxes. Some are afraid of getting caught up in illegal tax schemes. Others are simply ignorant of the
money-saving possibilities.
Understanding the role of tax management in asset protection is critical to your financial well-being. The key is to
identify, implement and maintain sound tax strategies in a legally compliant fashion. If you have a strategy solidly
grounded in tax law, capable of withstanding legal or audit scrutiny, which will save you money, it should be part
of your asset protection plan.
At Bulletproof Veil we help you with the all-important maintenance of your asset protection plan. This includes
monitoring your tax strategies to see if they comply with changes in federal and state law. When you look at saving taxes, consider the following:
1. Understand the Five Pillars of Tax Planning – At a high level, opportunities to save on taxes can be grouped into five categories: 1) Changing how you
take compensation; 2) Maximizing deductions to taxable income; 3) Lowering the tax rate applied to your
money; 4) Collecting tax credits and deferrals; and 5) Using fringe benefits. Bulletproof Veil can help you
apply these pillars to your specific circumstances.
2. Don’t Assume your Tax Return Preparer is the Best Source of Tax Strategies – Bulletproof Veil works with CPAs around the country. It’s amazing how many freely admit that they’d
rather have their clients overpay taxes than actively minimize them. For example, when informed by Bulletproof Veil of a $100,000 tax savings opportunity for a client if the CPA filed before a December 31
deadline, the CPA replied, “Oh, let’s not bother. He [the client] can always make another $100,000 next
year.” You need to work with competent tax strategists who can help you develop and implement a comprehensive plan.
3. Remember that Tax Laws Can Change Frequently – Tax laws and regulations are constantly changing. This process constantly opens up new tax savings opportunities, but it also can remove or change past rules that may impact your asset protection plan. You’ve
got to stay current in order to be compliant.
The monitoring and tracking of Bulletproof Veil is essential to help you maintain your asset protection plan. Contact your Bulletproof Veil representative for more information.
|
|
|
|   |
|
|
Georgia Court rules Cap on Noneconomic Malpractice Damages is Unconstitutional Superior Court Judge Marvin S. Arrington Sr. found the state’s $350,000 limit on noneconomic
damages for medical malpractice unconstitutional, saying it violated patients’ equal protection rights
and access to a jury trial. “There is no doubt that the caps go to the core of a party’s right to have a
jury determine his or her claims,” Arrington wrote. “One category of professional defendants has
been singled out for special protection, with the result that their victims have been singled out for
special disadvantages and limitations.” A February AMA report showed that states with noneconomic damage limits benefit from an increased supply of high-risk specialists.
Estate Tax Planning Will be Very Difficult from 2008 - 2011 Both the federal estate tax rate and the tax exemption amount will continue to change over the next
several years. In 2008, the exemption is $2 million, while it jumps to $3.5 million in 2009. In
2010, the estate tax disappears entirely, but unless Congress acts it returns in 2011 with a 55% top
tax rate and a $1 million exemption amount. If your total estate will be subject to estate tax, you
should consult with qualified professionals each year between now and 2011 to make sure your estate
documents are correctly structured. Otherwise, your death or your spouse’s death could be a very
expensive prospect for your heirs and beneficiaries.
Corporation-Suing Attorney Sentenced to 30 Months in Prison Melvyn Weiss, the plaintiffs’ lawyer who pioneered a controversial and lucrative area of law by suing
corporations on behalf of shareholders, was sentenced to 30 months in prison. Weiss pled guilty in
a federal racketeering conspiracy, admitting that he entered into “secret payment arrangements” with
individuals who agreed to serve as lead plaintiffs in class action lawsuits. Weiss co-founded the law
firm known now has Milberg LLP in 1965, helping build it for a time into a powerhouse that filed
more class actions -- and won more settlements -- than any other firm.
IRS is Increasing Audits of Small Companies while Easing Up on Large Firms According to a new study from the Transactional Records Clearinghouse at Syracuse University,
small companies were audited by the IRS 41% more often in 2007 than in 2005, and companies
with $10 million to $50 million in assets were 29% more likely to be investigated. Meanwhile,
companies with more than $250 million in assets were almost 40% less likely to be audited than in
previous years. “Large corporations, with their armies of tax attorneys and accountants, are able to
drag out an audit for years at a time,” explains Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who sits on
the House Committee on Ways and Means, which oversees the IRS. “Consequently, auditors tend
to focus on smaller businesses that lack such resources.”
|
|
|
|